News Writer Kirandeep Khosah reports on the Epstein Files and the scrutiny the Justice Department is facing over them
Content warning: child sexual abuse
Who was Jeffrey Epstein?
Jeffrey Epstein was an American Financier, initially renowned for his extensive network of high-profile associates in politics, academia, and business.
More than almost two decades ago, his image would change dramatically, registering himself as a sex offender after he pleaded guilty to state charges of soliciting prostitution from a minor. In this case, he secured a controversial plea deal that granted him immunity from federal prosecution at the time.
Once connected to powerful figures such as President Donald Trump and former Prince Andrew Mountbatten, his case is now a focal point for discussions of elite impunity and systemic failures in the justice system
In July 2019, he was apprehended again on severe federal indictments regarding sex trafficking, accused of maintaining a complex and predatory exploitation network. It was believed he and his partner Ghislaine Maxwell procured young girls for sexual abuse at the hands of wealthy men, although this would never go to trial as Epstein soon committed suicide in federal custody.
Once connected to powerful figures such as President Donald Trump and former Prince Andrew Mountbatten, his case is now a focal point for discussions of elite impunity and systemic failures in the justice system.
What are the ‘Epstein Files’?
The ‘Epstein Files’ refer to the collection of documents and evidence related to the criminal investigation of Maxwell and Epstein. These include photos, emails, and other such documents obtained during the investigation, alluding to his guilty status and the extent to which young women and children were abused within this prolific sex-trafficking ring.
Some showed graphic images of young women and children, while others included conversations between Epstein and his peers
After pressure from victims and the wider public, on November 18th, 2025, the U.S. Congress enacted legislation compelling the Department of Justice (DOJ) to disclose all files related to the Epstein case within 30 days. This bill was later signed into law the following day by President Trump, a surprise to many given the controversial nature of his own relationship with the prolific sex-trafficker. Epstein’s extensive ties to such elites cast doubt on the mandated release, raising concerns that, under this administration, the release may not occur at all.
Thousands of files were eventually released during the congressional-mandated window. Some showed graphic images of young women and children, while others included conversations between Epstein and his peers. However, in this timely release, extensive redactions were made for legal and privacy reasons, including to protect minor victims and ongoing investigations. Some pages were entirely blacked out, limiting their value. While some censorship protected minor victims, removing context obscured the true nature and extent of the crimes.
It can only be assumed that anything further to come will be subject to similar levels of redaction, but the extent to which this is merely protective of victims will remain debated
The DOJ compiled over 40,000 files, accounting for roughly 1% of the total number of documents, estimated at 2 million, which appears to validate public concerns about the transparency of the release.
Why the delay? Will we ever see the full files?
Citing the need to protect victim identities within a massive dataset, the DOJ has defended the delay as a legal necessity, whilst claiming ‘substantial progress,’ has been made.
As of now, it is unclear how things will progress, as the DOJ has not given an accurate indication of when further documents will be released.
Right now, we will just have to wait. It can only be assumed that anything further to come will be subject to similar levels of redaction, but the extent to which this is merely protective of victims will remain debated.
Looking for more? Check out these articles:
Australian Senator Suspended After Burka Protest in Parliament
California Votes Yes on Prop 50: What Does This Mean and What Next?
Comments