Film critic Cassandra Fong takes us back to Duncan Jones’ 2009 film, Moon, crediting its depiction of isolation, identity and deception

she/her, hk, english & creative writing
Published

When Duncan Jones’ Moon was released in 2009, it quickly carved its place as one of the most contemplative and haunting science-fiction films of the decade. With its minimalistic set design, stark isolation, and brooding atmosphere, Moon is often mistaken for a relic of the genre’s past—a quiet nod to 1970s-era sci-fi like 2001: A Space Odyssey and Solaris.

From the first frame, Moon distances itself from traditional sci-fi conventions. Jones creates a world where the trappings of space exploration are reduced to industrial labour. Sam Bell (Sam Rockwell) is nearing the end of his three-year mission on the moon, overseeing the extraction of helium-3 for Earth’s energy supply for Lunar Industries. His only companion is GERTY (Kevin Spacey), the base’s coldly pragmatic AI.

The camera’s frequent use of close-ups on Sam’s face underscores his psychological isolation and the fragmented state of his mind as he begins to unravel.

One of the most striking features of Moon is its cinematography, handled by Gary Shaw, which embodies the central themes of alienation and entrapment. Shaw’s visual style is clinical and precise, favouring tight, constrained shots that amplify the sense of confinement. Every inch of the Sarang Lunar Base, though vast, is intentionally framed to suggest that Sam Bell is physically and psychologically caged. There are no sprawling landscapes of the lunar surface to offer hope or escape. Instead, Shaw captures the base’s sterile corridors and bland interiors with an overwhelming sense of rigidity. The camera’s frequent use of close-ups on Sam’s face underscores his psychological isolation and the fragmented state of his mind as he begins to unravel.

Clint Mansell’s score and the sound design play a pivotal role in shaping Moon’s atmosphere, but they also contribute to its emotional distance. The soundscape is minimal, largely relying on ambient drones and long silences that stretch through the duration of the film. Mansell’s score is unsettling but doesn’t fully register the way it should. The film’s sound design amplifies the absence of life in Sam’s world, yet the eerie quietness creates a sense of emptiness rather than evoking deep emotional engagement. The sparse use of music — often no more than a subtle drone or low strings — perfectly matches the sterile, uninhabited spaces Sam occupies. But, much like the visuals, the sound design is not designed to foster connection; it only reinforces the oppressive sense of isolation.

It is a quiet film about loud questions

But Rockwell’s portrayal of Sam is what drives the emotional heart of the film. His performance is marked by a palpable sense of fragility, as Sam grapples with the fact that everything he has believed about himself is a fabrication. It’s an existential horror unlike anything typically seen in science fiction: not the fear of death, but the fear of having never truly lived. The central theme is the fragility of personal identity, and Jones uses the lunar setting and the plot twist to push this idea to its extreme. The horror Sam experiences? His life is not his own; it’s part of a cycle of exploited labour. His identity is a product of corporate necessity, not personal evolution.

Moon endures not just because it’s a well-crafted, emotionally resonant film, but because it holds up a mirror to a world that has since caught up with — and in many ways surpassed — its speculative fiction. It is a quiet film about loud questions: about identity, autonomy, memory, labour, and the quiet violence of systems that appear humane on the surface but are structurally indifferent.

Poisoned Apple: Why Disney Should Have Left Snow White Alone

Film Review: Thunderbolts*

Interview: Die Before You Die

Comments